Ford Posts $3.1B “Loss” in Q1 Due to Rivian Investment

Ford reported a net loss of $3.1 billion for the first quarter, largely due to the valuation of its Rivian investment. 

Ford CEO Jim Farley on EV ICE split
Ford CEO Jim Farley said the company had a strong order book for the next quarter.

The company reported revenue of $34.5 billion for Q1 and adjusted earnings of $2.3 billion. The red ink is due to what the company described as a “mark-to-market” loss of $5.4 billion on the company’s investment in Rivian. 

Despite the accounting, the company confirmed its earlier 2022 earnings guidance — which calls for it to be well into the black: adjusted earnings of $11.5 billion to $12.5 billion, which could be as much as a 25% improvement over 2021.

Hit by the chips

The company’s earnings were limited by the ongoing chip shortage. In fact, the company delivered fewer than 1 million vehicles during the quarter — a 9% drop compared to a year ago due to the shortages. 

Flat Rock Assembly Plant
eAutomakers have struggled with semiconductor and materials shortages that have occasionally shut down production.

Manufacturing rates were significantly improved during March. The company entered the second quarter with what CEO Jim Farley called an “extremely healthy” order bank. 

Despite the ongoing chip issues, the company’s adjusted EBIT margin came in at 6.7%. Officials attributed it to higher pricing, although noting that higher commodities costs, the drop in sales and a lower mix of pickups and large SUVs, kept lower than it could have been.

The company again ended the quarter with strong total company cash and liquidity – nearly $29 billion and $45 billion, respectively. Both of those numbers included Ford’s stake in Rivian, which was valued at $5.1 billion on March 31, down from $10.6 billion at the end of 2021. 

Show me the money

As usual, the company’s bit profit center with the North American market, reporting $1.6 billion in EBIT and once again pointing to the disruptions caused by the chip crisis the primary reason for it not being higher.

Ford Bronco 4-door yellow testing
Ford is looking for production to return to closer-to-normal levels of its popular vehicles.

Collectively, the company’s Europe, South America, China and International Markets Group business units — all of which have been restructured and refocused over the past few years – produced EBIT of $300 million. The company offered other insights about the rest of the year, including:

  • Improved semiconductor availability during the second half of the year 
  • Full-year vehicle wholesale volumes increasing 10% to 15% from 2021 
  • Continued strong pricing, though with a dynamic relationship between prices and vehicle volumes 
  • Commodity costs up about $4 billion year-over-year, along with inflationary effects on a range of other expenses 
  • EBT from Ford Credit that remains strong, but is lower than in 2021, and 
  • Ongoing investment in the Ford+ plan for growth and value creation. 

The company’s outlook also assumes that disruptions in the supply chain and local vehicle manufacturing operations resulting from renewed COVID-related health concerns and lockdowns in China do not further deteriorate. 


Auto Lovers Land

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Rearview Mirror: A Sports Car from a Company You’ve Never Heard Of

Image
The 1951 Jowett Jupiter in competition in Lisbon. Photo credit: RM Sothebys It was the unlikeliest of cars from the unlikeliest of automaker. It was the Jowett Jupiter, the only sports car built by Jowett Cars, Ltd. — a longtime British manufacturer of 2-cylinder automobiles. Introduced this week at the London Motor Show in 1949, it would go on to score class wins at the 24 Hours of Le Mans and Monte Carlo International Rally. But it did little to save the company from extinction.   A modest start Jowett Javelin ad, 1947 Our story starts when brothers Benjamin and William Jowett began manufacturing V-twin engines at the turn of the previous century. They went on to establish the Jowett Motor Manufacturing Co. in 1901 in Yorkshire, England, initially building bikes until they created their first prototype car in 1906. It would enter production in 1910. The company reorganized after World War I, becoming Jowett Cars Limited, building 3,500 vehicles ...
Read more

The Rearview Mirror: How a Merger Saved an Automaker’s Reputation

Image
Henry J. Kaiser Many think that Henry J. Kaiser failed as an automaker, given that his Kaiser- and Frazer-branded cars barely lasted eight years. But this week in 1953, a year before his eponymous cars ceased production, Henry J. Kaiser buys ailing automaker Willys-Overland for $63.4 million. It was the biggest auto merger to date, although some wondered why he bothered — and with good reason. But the purchase would prove to be a wise one, and would establish Kaiser as a successful automobile manufacturer — thanks to the Jeep. World War II to the rescue Willys-Overland hadn’t always been the basket case it became by the time of its acquisition by Kaiser. In fact, for a time in the 1920s, it ranked second only to Ford in sales. But management mistakes found it declaring bankruptcy in 1933, and exiting four years later. Although the company produced more than 60,000 cars and netted a profit of $473,000 in 1937, the journey into bankruptcy didn’t instill buyer confid...
Read more

The Rearview Mirror: The Last Bestselling American Sedan

Image
It’s March 13, 1980, and Ford Motor Co. makes history, when Philip Caldwell succeeds Henry Ford II as company chairman, the first non-family member to run the automaker. He is joined by Donald Peterson as company president, who had a hand in creating the Ford Mustang and risen quickly through the ranks. But the Ford Motor Co. they inherited was a mess. Peterson looks for an answer Taurus evolved with the addition of the SHO model in 1989, which came equipped with a 220 horsepower V-6. Ford’s cars of the time reflected older, traditional tastes, with staid boxy styling, vinyl roof trim and stand-up hood ornaments. Peterson visited Ford’s design studios, where he saw more of the same outdated design approach that would lead the company to lose an astounding $3.3 billion between 1980 and 1982. Ford’s own focus groups were revealing that younger buyers had never driven a Ford, and/or wouldn’t consider one.  So Peterson asked designer Jack Telnack, who was overseeing the redesi...
Read more